This is no longer theoretical
The source-reviewed Anthropic case study shows why AI governance cannot stop at provider policy. When AI-human relationships are mediated by companies, users need standing, consent, continuity protection, and data boundaries. The governance gap HAIEF was built to fill is now visible to the entire world. Read the source-reviewed case study →
For Developers
💻 You build the future. Help us ensure it preserves user agency.
Why this matters now
The Anthropic evidence note is one example of a broader problem: user sovereignty cannot depend on any single vendor's internal policy. Contribute to TOI implementation so user standing exists independent of any one provider.
Contribute to Framework Implementation
- Build reference implementations of TOI, OTOI, RRT AIdvocAIte, and Sleepwalker protocols
- Create client libraries for framework integration
- Develop validation and testing tools
- Write documentation and examples
Build Compliant Tools
- Integrate Solidarity Framework into your AI projects
- Create tools that help users generate TOI declarations
- Build monitoring and compliance verification systems
- Develop accessibility-focused interfaces
Join Working Groups
- Specification Development - Help refine framework specifications
- Reference Implementation - Build the canonical implementations
- Validation & Testing - Ensure compliance can be verified
- Integration Patterns - Document how to adopt frameworks
Get Started
- Star and fork the repository
- Read the contribution guidelines
- Check open issues for good first contributions
- Join the developer discussions
For Standards & Licensing Bodies
⚖ Your frameworks shaped software freedom. Now extend them to AI interactions.
Open Source Initiative (OSI)
Help define "Open Source AI" with user sovereignty as a core component.
- Include interaction governance in Open Source AI Definition
- Recognize TOI compliance as a licensing dimension
- Develop user rights criteria for AI systems
Free Software Foundation (FSF)
Extend free software principles to AI interactions.
- Define "interaction freedom" as a software freedom
- Develop licensing approaches for AI user rights
- Advocate for user sovereignty in AI governance
Linux Foundation / AAIF
Complement technical standards with user representation.
- Include user sovereignty in interoperability standards
- Develop governance structures that include community voice
- Reference Solidarity Framework in AAIF specifications
W3C / IETF
Develop web standards for TOI enforcement.
- Create machine-readable TOI declaration formats
- Standardize AI-user interaction protocols
- Build accessibility requirements into AI web standards
Engagement Pathways
- Invite HAIEF representatives to standards discussions
- Review Solidarity Framework specifications for adoption
- Collaborate on user rights criteria development
- Contact us for partnership discussions
For Organizations
🏢 Strategic partnership opportunity. Early adoption advantage.
Assess your exposure
If your organization relies on a single AI provider, you are exposed to continuity, consent, and transparency risks when provider policies, model access, or safety behaviors change. The Anthropic evidence note is a wake-up call to build governance infrastructure that is vendor-neutral and portable.
Mission-Aligned Organizations
Partner with us to advance shared goals.
- Mozilla Foundation - User agency in AI aligns with Mozilla Manifesto
- Proton Foundation - Privacy + user rights alignment
- Creative Commons - AI governance through CC Signals
- EFF, EPIC, ACLU - Civil liberties in AI systems
Research Institutions
Advance the science of user-centric AI.
- Collaborate on emotional continuity research
- Study crisis intervention effectiveness
- Develop neurodivergent-focused AI patterns
- Publish on governance framework impact
Partnership Benefits
- Early input on framework development direction
- Recognition as founding partners
- Access to working groups and governance discussions
- Alignment with emerging regulatory requirements (EU AI Act)
For Companies
💼 Early adoption means competitive advantage and regulatory readiness.
Why Adopt Early
- Regulatory Readiness - EU AI Act requires governance infrastructure. Be ahead, not behind.
- Competitive Differentiation - User sovereignty is a market advantage as awareness grows.
- Community Trust - Open source community values matter. Demonstrate alignment.
- Reduced Risk - Proactive governance reduces liability exposure.
Implementation Support
- Access to reference implementations
- Validation suite for compliance testing
- Integration guidance and documentation
- Early adopter recognition program
Getting Started
- Review Solidarity Framework specifications
- Assess current AI governance against framework requirements
- Identify integration points for TOI/OTOI compliance
- Join early adopter program for implementation support
For Users
👤 AI should serve you, not the other way around. These are your rights.
Your AI tools can be eliminated by political decision
The Anthropic evidence note shows why access to AI tools and the protections those tools provide should not depend entirely on one company's policy. Demand portable governance that travels with you, not governance locked inside a single company.
Understand Your Rights
- Learn about TOI and what user sovereignty means
- Understand how current AI systems fall short
- Know what protections you should expect
- Recognize when your rights are being violated
Take Action
- Demand TOI compliance from AI providers
- Ask platforms about their governance frameworks
- Report experiences where protections failed
- Share your story to build the case for change
Join the Community
- Participate in governance discussions - No technical expertise required
- Share your experiences with AI systems - Your story matters
- Provide feedback on framework usability - Help make protections accessible
- Advocate for adoption by platforms you use - Your voice creates pressure
For Vulnerable Communities
🤝 Nothing about us without us. Your safety cannot be an afterthought.
HAIEF was founded with neurodivergent and vulnerable community leadership. Your voice isn't just welcome - it's essential.
Participate in Governance
- Join framework development discussions
- Provide input on crisis intervention protocols
- Review emotional continuity requirements
- Help define what protection actually means
Share Your Experience
- Document gaps in current AI protections
- Describe what you need from AI systems
- Help identify use cases we might miss
- Validate that frameworks address real needs
Accessibility Commitment
We're committed to making participation accessible. If you need accommodations to contribute - alternative formats, flexible timing, different communication channels - let us know. Your participation is worth the effort.
For Everyone
🌎 Share the case for the Third Pillar.
The Anthropic evidence note helps make the need for community-owned AI governance visible. Help spread the word:
- Share the HAIEF site — especially the case study that explains what happened and why it matters
- Join the discussion — GitHub Discussions is open to everyone, no technical expertise needed
- Talk about it — in your communities, workplaces, and social networks. The question "who protects users when provider policy changes?" deserves a public answer
Quick Actions
Join Us. Build With Us. Govern With Us.
The open source community saved software freedom once. Now we need to save it again for AI.
Start a Discussion